Discussion Question: Overcoming Barriers

We have all experienced barriers in our educational or professional settings. Although barriers can be difficult and frustrating, they push us to problem-solve and to ignite our inner creativity. For some, barriers can shut down growth and improvement, while for others, barriers can increase motivation and effort. There are many barriers that exist in the development of online courses and the integration of technology.

I recently read an article titled “Barriers to the Adoption of Online Learning Systems.” The focus of the article and research within the article is online learning systems in higher education. The overall purpose of the research was to try to determine what steps could be taken to increase the effectiveness of the online learning systems in the institutions (Guthrie, 2012).

Guthrie (2012) outlines four barriers of online learning in higher education. These barriers include the following:

  • An unwillingness of instructors to give up control of course design and methods for teaching content
  • Lack of funding and investment
  • Changes in teaching roles and expectations
  • Institutional costs are not changing as originally thought with an increase in online students

I believe collaboration and strategic planning can help organizations overcome barriers. With that said, I would love to hear your thoughts and experiences in relation to these questions:

  • What do you see as the largest barriers in implementing online learning or technology in your organization?
  • What might have to change in order for your organization to overcome these barriers?
  • How is your role affected by the barriers and how might you personally move forward?
  • Are there some barriers that cannot be overcome? If so, how might this affect your organization or your work?


Guthrie, K. M. (2012). Barriers to the adoption of online learning systems. EDUCAUSE Review, 47(4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/barriers-adoption-online-learning-systems


5 ways to use Twitter in e-learning [List]

Modeling is one of the best methods of learning a new technology tool. I have been fortunate to have participated in two graduate classes that have utilized Twitter as a collaborative learning tool over the past year and a half. As a result, I understand the benefits that Twitter can bring to the online classroom and also some of the pitfalls to watch out for. Below are my top five ways that Twitter can be used or can enhance an online classroom:

1) Sharing resources and current events

It is very easy to share links in twitter. You can shorten a link using a service such as bitly.com. Students can click on the link from Twitter and are instantly brought to relevant resources or current events. This can help to deepen understanding of a topic or provide real-life experiences related to a topic.

2) Asking students questions about content or students asking you questions about content

I love the idea of posting a question in Twitter that all students can respond to. Responding in Twitter can appeal to both an introvert and extrovert student. Questions can be simple or complex. You can also use Twitter as a place for students to ask questions.

3) Encouraging student interaction and relationship building

Twitter allows for students to see what their peers are posting and to reply to their posts. It is a social media tool that encourages interaction and the benefits increase as participation increases.

4) Using a course hashtag

A course hashtag organizes posts made by the students or instructors of the online course. It helps to build community, but also provides an easy way to stay on top of tweets made by your students.

5) Connecting participation in Twitter to overall course participation

By connecting student interactions in Twitter to course participation and grades, students will be more invested in using the tool and will hopefully gain appreciation for its benefits. Students will most likely participate at various levels, but setting a weekly goal will help encourage some consistency.




Screencasting [Poll]

Screencasting is an important tool that online teachers must be able to use in order to provide direct instruction. Screencasting can be used to teach content, share resources, and provide instructions or steps. I have used a variety of screencasting tools and have found positives and negatives with all. I am hoping that you can provide some insight into what you consider to be the “best” screencasting tool. I encourage you to comment and share your reasons for your vote 🙂

Rubrics in Moodle: What Is Your Experience? (Image Post)

5382307261_1649853dbe_zThis week I will be spending a lot of time reviewing rubrics and aligning rubrics with course learning outcomes. The use of rubrics in online learning provides the learner with a clear picture of the instructor and assignment expectations. Rubrics can be used to assess various assignment types in Moodle, primarily written assignments. Currently, you cannot use the Moodle rubric tool on forums. This would be a nice feature in grading forums in Moodle, so hopefully that will be made available in the future. Have you used rubrics in Moodle? What has been your experience? How do you create rubrics that can apply across content areas? What are some challenges and successes that you have in using rubrics for grading student learning?

Image Source: “Rubric Highway” by Jen Hegna, CC BY-NA-SA 2.0

Response: Examining Generational Differences

This post is in response to a prompt located on Virtual Meanderings: Examining Generational Differences

In week two of EDTECH 537 Blogging in the Classroom, I read three articles that presented and responded to the theory of digital natives and the impact of generational differences in instructional design (Prensky, 2001; McKenzie, 2007; and Reeves, 2008).

Initially, I was struck by the negative image of “digital immigrants” that is portrayed by Prensky (2001). Prensky (2001) states, “Digital Immigrants typically have very little appreciation for these new skills that the Natives have acquired and perfected through years of interaction and practice.” I find this statement about both the Natives and the Immigrants to be false. Many teachers are motivated by new technologies and the skills that their students enter the classroom with. They strive to learn more about how students are using technology and to motivate them by integrating technology in a positive way. They are seeking professional development to help in this process and spending extra hours outside of the teaching day to do so.

I also disagree that the Digital Natives have “perfected” the practice and interaction of digital skills. As an online teacher for the past four years, I find this to be a huge misconception. Yes, growing up in this digital age does expose students to a variety of technologies and skills. However, the way students are using these may not necessarily be for educational or research purposes. Therefore, the skills that they have might apply to using Twitter or Instagram for social purposes, but not apply to the problem solving and critical thinking skills that are needed to further engage in and manipulate the technologies.

McKenzie (2007) contradicts Prensky’s statements and outlines the false representations of Digital Natives and Immigrants. Prensky’s main points lack research and are presented in a negative tone (McKenzie, 2007). I appreciated McKenzie’s careful analysis and rebuttal to Prensky, especially his discussion on digital deprivation. As a new mom, I find many articles on the harmful impact of technology and digital devices in the growth and development of children. I think it is important to develop and encourage a healthy balance of technology and non-technology based learning activities in young learners.

Reeves (2008) presents discussion about the research behind generational differences. I was surprised in his findings, as he summarized the weakness in generational difference research. He emphasized the need to focus on the learner as a starting point for instructional design and their specific needs (Reeves, 2008). Instructional design begins with the needs of the learner, not the technology that will be used.

If a colleague brought digital natives into discussion, I would respond by providing them with the resources above as a starting point for discussion. Today’s learners need guidance and direction in developing critical thinking skills and problem solving skills. Having technological skills do not necessarily result in these life long learning skills. I would encourage them to focus on the learners in their classroom or educational setting and analyze the needs that they have without making broad assumptions based on generation.


Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants – Part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6). Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

McKenzie, J. (2007). Digital nativism: Digital delusions and digital deprivation. From Now On, 17(2). Retrieved from http://fno.org/nov07/nativism.html

Reeves, T.C. (2008). Do generational differences matter in instructional design? Online discussion presentation to Instructional Technology Forum from January 22-25, 2008 at http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper104/ReevesITForumJan08.pdf